India Summary |
| Posted: 23 Sep 2010 04:18 AM PDT
Earlier on Wednesday, the Supreme Court had deferred hearing on a plea to postpone the Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suit after a bench said it did not have the “determination” to take up the matter. The bench while refusing to hear the petition filed by retired bureacrat Ramesh Chand Tripathi. The Allahabad High Court had also imposed “exemplary costs” of Rs 50,000, terming Tripathi’s effort for an out-of-court settlement of the dispute as a “mischievous attempt”. Tripathi had approached the Apex court five days after a three-judge Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court rejected his petition for deferring the verdict and to allow mediation to find a solution to the 60-year-old Ram Janambhoomi – Babri Masjid title suit dispute. In the petition filed through advocate Sunil Jain, Tripathi had cited several reasons for deferment of the verdict, which he said would be in “public interest” in view of the apprehension of communal flare up, upcoming Commonwealth Games, elections in Bihar and violence in Kashmir Valley and Naxal-hit states. The petition had feared that there would be inadequate security personnel in Uttar Pradesh to provide security. Tripathi had also referred to an earlier order of the Court on July 27 last that parties concerned are at liberty to approach the Officer on Special Duty for formation of the bench if there was any possibility of disposal of the dispute or arrival at an understanding through consensus. One of the three judges in the Lucknow bench, however, disagreed with the majority order rejecting the plea for deferring the Ayodhya verdict to allow mediation and gave a dissenting opinion that an amicable settlement could have been explored. Justice Dharam Veer Sharma, while not concurring with the view of the other two judges–Justice S U Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal–also said in his dissenting judgement that he wasn’t consulted when the three-judge bench gave the order while dismissing the plea for mediation. Mobile telecom services providers asked to ban all bulk SMS and MMS service till Saturday (September 25, 2010) across India for next 72 hours with immediate effect in view of the impending ayodhya/ babri masjid verdict on Ramjanambhoomi – Babri Masjid title suits by the Special Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, scheduled for Friday. Tags: ayodhya judgement, ayodhya verdict, babri masjid, babri verdict Related posts |
| CSK vs Warriors LIVE Streaming – Chennai Super Kings vs Warriors Highlights Posted: 22 Sep 2010 10:39 PM PDT
CSK vs Warriors LIVE Streaming or Chennai Super Kings vs Warriors Highlights can be checked here as Champions Chennai Super Kings vs Warriors Match held on Wednesday, September 22, 2010. The game began at 17.30 pm. Viewers have the excitement that whether csk or war who will go to the semi finals and here is the CSK vs Warriors Results where Chennai Super Kings 136 for 6 (Hussey 50, Vijay 35, Kreusch 3-19) beat Warriors 126 for 8 (Jacobs 32, Ashwin 3-24). Checkout here for CSK vs Warriors Live Score and Chennai Super Kings vs Warriors Highlights. Chennai Super Kings Warriors Tags: chennai super kings vs warriors highlights, csk vs warriors Related posts |
| You are subscribed to email updates from India Summary To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
No comments:
Post a Comment